This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3. Laryngopharyngeal morbidity parameter with scores Scores 0 1 2 3 Sore throat none minimal moderate Severe; never an SAD again Dysphagia none minimal moderate Severe; cannot eat Hoarseness none minimal moderate Severe; cannot speak SAD: The influence of cuff volumes on oropharyngeal leak pressure and fibreoptic position with the laryngeal mask airway. Support Center Support Center. Proseal LMA was as effective as endotracheal tube during positive pressure ventilation in preventing gastric distension and aspiration when correctly placed. The anatomical position of the device was assessed by introducing a flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope into the airway tube to a position proximal to the terminal end.

Comparison of changes in mean heart rate between two groups Click here to view. Indian J Anaesth ; Cause, prevention and treatment. Br J Anaesth ; Table 5 Insertion characteristics.

Mallampati Class I — II.

The following parameters were recorded as primary airway sealing pressure or secondary outcome measures; Airway Sealing Pressure in cmH2O at 5 mins post-placement. Both PLM and BM are essentially dual channel supralaryngeal airway devices with the provision for separation of airway from gastric tract.

Comparison of clinical performance of the I-gel with LMA proseal

Airway morbidity after use proesal the laryngeal mask airway LMA Proseal vs. Anaesth Intensive Care ; Ease of insertion of the gastric tube was recorded as either: During anesthesia hemodynamic parameters were recorded prior to insertion of the device and then at 1, 5, 10, and 15 minutes after the insertion of device.


proseal lma thesis

Comparison of changes in mean EtCO2 between two groups Click here to view. This study was a randomized prospective comparative study. The inflatable cuff of PLMA may be the cause of various malpositions after insertion. A multicenter study comparing the La and Classic laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients.

Comparison of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway Vs Endotracheal Tube for Laparoscopic Surgery

A novel supraglottic airway without inflatable cuff. Comparative study between I-gel, a new supraglottic airway device, and classical laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized spontaneously ventilated patients.

proseal lma thesis

A cohort study of I-gel in elective patients. Stewart A, Lindsay WA.

J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol ; This mean difference of 5. There were no incidences of bronchospasm, laryngospasm, aspiration, regurgitation, and hoarseness in both the groups. Tidal volume loss was detected by inspiratory set – expiratory outcome volume on the ventilator display screen.

proseal lma thesis

There were statistically significant differences regarding postoperative adverse events between the 2 groups. However, the mean insertion time was significantly shorter in the BM group as compared to the PLM group by a mean of 5. The mean leak fraction observed in the BM group of our study Randomized crossover comparison of the proseal with the classic laryngeal mask airway in unparalysed anaesthetized patients.


Financial and environmental costs of reusable and single use anaesthetic equipment. Results of a descriptive trial with experience of cases. Failure was defined as inability to advance the orogastric tube into the stomach within 2 attempts.

The airway sealing pressure was the pressure rposeal which leak starts.

Comparison of clinical performance of the I-gel with LMA proseal

Randomization was done using computer generated random numbers. I-gel supraglottic airway device thseis Non inflatable cuff. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: Second, being devoid of an inflatable cuff, time to inflate the cuff and volume adjustment as required in PLM, is not needed. The leak fraction was calculated as: Saudi J Anaesth ;4: Br J Anaesth ; This article has been cited by 1 Changes in hardness and resilience of i-gelTM cuffs with temperature: Following uniform induction with propofol Thereafter, monitoring was done at minute intervals till the end of surgery.

Author: admin